![]() |
| Picture source: Cutcaster |
In the latest lecture, two questions are raised for the article Social Cloud Computing: A Vision for Socially Motivated Resource Sharing:
1. What is the definition of Social Cloud?
2. What are the possible applications of a Social Cloud?
The answers are easily found in the article:
1. A Social Cloud is a resource and service sharing framework utilizing relationships established
between members of a social network.
2. A Social Computation Cloud; A Social Storage Cloud; A Social Collaborative Cloud; A Social Cloud for Public Science; An Enterprise Social Cloud.
- Is there any differences in terms of individual and group epistemic cognition, how?
All of our group members got the same answer except for Guan Hao, who had more comments on the definition by searching the Internet. And we have all agreed to adopt the comments. The comments are below:
Social Cloud can provide some kinds of services and these services are actually provided and maintained by a social network instead of centralized servers. The type of the services does not matter, it can be computational work, storage, collaborative… therefore there are lots of applications listed in this article. As long as the services are provided by a social network and it utilizes the relationships established in a social network, it is considered as a Social Cloud.
- How did you approach to the problem individually and in group, respectively? Is there any differences in the processes involved?
The approach is also different. For activity one, I just try to find answer in the article. In the activity two, more approaches are added including discussing and searching the Internet. However, due to time limit, we didn't find much more about it.

Yeah this blog is fun and a bit funny! =)
ReplyDeleteIndeed the group target is to verify as well as to explore. It's interesting you pointed out the time concern, and it's true that a good timing arrangement is a must during all sorts of discussion. Next during discussion we should hire a time keeper. :D
BTW can I vote for both funny and interesting? LOL